TAMESIDE HOSPITAL – Statement by Andrew Gwynne MP

_47166401_42139540

I take very seriously the findings of the Francis Report into chronic failings at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. It is a thorough report into some appalling lapses in care and standards, and it is right that appropriate action is taken right across the NHS to ensure these failings are not repeated anywhere else in England.

Most people receive excellent care from clinicians in the NHS, and I want to pay tribute to the many thousands of doctors and nurses that work round the clock to ensure that happens. Sadly, as we’ve seen, there are occasions where the NHS sometimes falls short of those standards.

I am not in the business of running my local hospital down. Most people using Tameside Hospital will only ever have experienced the best of care possible. But it would be incorrect to say that is a complete picture. I know from my own constituency casework, that there are people who have been let down by Tameside Hospital. And the hospital continues to feature on the radar of both Monitor, the Foundation Trust regulator, and of the Care Quality Commission. Some improvements have been made, but in my opinion, not quickly enough.

I don’t think Tameside is another Mid Staffordshire, but there are fundamental issues that do need to be resolved. I have previously gone on the record saying there is need for a change in leadership at the hospital. I stand by that view. The current chief executive has presided over a series of crises over a number of years, and yet the issues at the hospital remain. I think we need a fresh approach to Tameside’s problems that will only come about with a new chief executive to provide a fresh viewpoint and new direction.

Of course, on one level it’s extremely disappointing that Tameside is one of five problem hospitals in England identified by the NHS Chief Medical Director, Professor Sir Bruce Keogh. But it is also an opportunity.

I wholeheartedly welcome his investigation, and patients and staff should have nothing to fear.

I hope Sir Bruce’s high-level input will result in some clear change, real action and most importantly – visible improvements – at Tameside Hospital, so that our borough can have the best NHS hospital services possible: the kind of services that frankly Tameside people deserve.

Andrew Gwynne is the Member of Parliament for Denton and Reddish, a constituency in Greater Manchester that is partly served by Tameside General Hospital, and a member of Labour’s frontbench Shadow Health Team.

———————–

JOINT PRESS STATEMENT BY TAMESIDE’S MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

Tameside MPs Jonathan Reynolds, David Heyes and Andrew Gwynne said:

“We welcome this inquiry into Tameside Hospital.

“The people of Tameside deserve access to hospital services and healthcare that they can trust – but for too long there have been strong indications that this has not been the case.

“Although there are signs that the hospital has been making some improvements, we are still contacted by too many people who complain about delayed and poor treatment.

“As MPs, we have worked consistently with the Hospital, the CQC and Monitor to ensure care is of the requisite standard and that local people can have confidence that it is.  At times we have had to be extremely frank with the Hospital management about how they are viewed by our constituents, and request changes to key personnel.  The inquiry is an opportunity to continue the scrutiny that the Hospital needs.

“The full remit of this inquiry is yet to be published – but, above all, it must have the full power to act on its findings.

“We look forward to working with it to ensure the long-term future of a strong local hospital in Tameside”.

The three Tameside MPs have met regularly with Tameside Hospital’s chairman and chief executive, as well as with representatives from the Care Quality Commission and Monitor and will continue to do so.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “TAMESIDE HOSPITAL – Statement by Andrew Gwynne MP

  1. I truly believe that Tameside Hospital let my beautiful hardworking dad down, infact it’s taken me over 2 years to get to grips with it all, i now know hand on heart what they did and didn’t do, i don’t know how to go about making them accountable for their dire actions and lack of care for him, please help me do the right thing, i owe it to my dad.

    • Totally understand Christine. If you are a constituent of mine then email me the details of what happened. I am happy to take it up with the Hospital for you as a first step. Dont know whether the time had now passed to then take it to the Health Service Ombudsman if the Hospital’s response remains unsatisfactory. There may be an opportunity to feed the case into the review by Professor Sir Bruce Keogh though. Let’s see.
      GWYNNEA@parliament.uk

  2. Sadly, I do think Tameside is another Mid Staffordshire. The medical treatment my father received there in 2009 was very poor – his doctor frankly, was incompetent. Standards of nursing in his ward were very low indeed. Many of the patient’s experiences I read about at Mid Staffordshire, I witnessed at Tameside.

    However my father did not die at Tameside Hospital, so his death will not be recorded in their statistics. Tameside discharged him two weeks before his death.

    He was admitted to Stepping Hill as an emergency almost immediately after being discharged from Tameside. He died two weeks later.

    As an ordinary member of the public, our experience of the NHS is very likely different to that of a member of Parliament. We ‘don’t count’ and it is easy for us to become cynical of the NHS, when its behaviour does so much to foster distrust.

    Simply put, I do not believe that the serious problems which have beset parts of Tameside Hospital for a number of years will ever be acknowledged, or even properly investigated and uncovered.

  3. Re. Tameside NHS Foundation Trust.
    Perhaps if dialogue from all concerned parties was evidence based then a discussion and concensus could take place. But the trust and its management are unable to provide any clear information in plain english about the reasons for its inability to set and follow budgetry constaints.
    Clinical decisions regarding levels of service and subsequent care would appear to be a secondary concern and meeting fiscal targets which have become impossible to meet due to the pfi contracts which the trust is obliged to maintain a primary concern. And yet once more, the people who are paid large salaries to manage and be accountable for their actions appear able to manage badly without fear of sanction. Where else in any other industrialised democracy would this situation occur?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s